SEARCH

Svfara Marine Inc. SV696 2006

BOAT REVIEW
In a wakeboarding world where V-drive boats continually steal the show in wake performance, the SV696 has gained credibility among our testers as one of the few direct-drive contenders in the wake department. This massive 23-foot-long, 102-inch-wide direct-drive has all the essential wakeboarding machine features. The SV696’s wide shape provides plenty of room for extra ballast as well as a V-drive-style wraparound seating pit, and its clean-looking tower and unique styling lines lend it an undeniable wakeboarding flavor.

WAKES
Right out of the box with 1,100 pounds of factory ballast, the SV696 produces large, advanced-level wakes with excellent shape. These rampy wakes are trough-free, with long landing zones that are great for moves to blind. The double-ups had nice shape for a consistent launch.

HANDLING
We noticed a significant degree of performance enhancement compared to last year. The difference? The optional MerCruiser 8.1-liter, 370-horsepower engine. With this setup we had increased power out of the hole and the top-end speed was 4 mph faster. Considering the SV696’s beefy size, the engine upgrade is well worth it, especially for heavy-ballast wakeboarding sessions.

COMFORT
The SV696 is one of the most spacious direct-drives we tested, and this boat packs a lot of comfort into its 102-inch beam. Passengers will love the transom walk-through that opens onto a large integrated platform.

SPECS
Base price: $56,600
Length: 23 ft.
Beam: 102 in.
Seating capacity: 12
Fuel capacity: 45 gal.
Test Prop: 13 x 13 3-blade
Test Engine: Horizon MerCruiser 8.1L, 370 hp
Top Speed: 47.9 mph 4,800 rpm
Accel. To 30 mph: 6.0 sec. 143.9 ft.
Accel. To 36 mph: 7.5 sec. 218.2 ft.
Noise Levels (db): Neutral 70 D 75 R, 36 mph 90 D 93 R
Categories: Boat Reviews Boats 2006 Ski Boats Svfara Marine Inc. VTD

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Reply